Kanu, however, maintained in open court on Wednesday that there were no valid charges against him and insisted he would not enter any defence over what he described as a charge filed under a repealed law.
During the proceedings, instead of commencing his defence, Kanu challenged the validity of the charges. He argued that the Supreme Court, in its earlier judgment directing his trial, had mandated the Federal Government to amend the charge, as the original law under which he was charged had been repealed. He stated that the prosecution had failed to comply with this directive.
“The Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act has been repealed. I cannot enter a defence under a repealed law. I will not do that,” Kanu insisted.
Justice Omotosho advised him to reserve his arguments for the appropriate stage, but Kanu declined, reiterating his position that there was no legal basis for the trial to proceed.
At one point, Kanu indicated readiness to open his defence but requested time to consult with his four legal consultants—Nnaemeka Ejiofor, Aloy Ejimakor, Maxwell Okpara and Mandela Umegborogu.
The judge then urged him again to seek guidance from legal practitioners familiar with criminal procedure.
Earlier, counsel to the Federal Government, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), had asked the court to enforce its earlier order requiring Kanu to open his defence or waive the right entirely.
However, Justice Omotosho stated that he was willing to extend time once more, giving Kanu another chance to reconsider his stand before deciding whether to defend the charges or forgo that right.