The Coalition of Concerned Nigerian Citizens (CCNC) has rejected the new policy on borehole drilling permits recently introduced by the Osun State Government.
In a press statement dated August 29, 2025, and signed by the group’s Chairman, Abdulsalam Akinkunmi, and Secretary, Owolabi Hassan, the coalition described the policy as unfair, extortionate, and anti-masses.
The policy, announced by the Osun State Commissioner for Water Resources and published in the Nigerian Tribune of August 28, 2025, requires individuals and companies to obtain drilling permits at a fee of ₦50,000 per borehole.
The statement noted that this move would further worsen the financial burden on citizens already struggling to access clean water.
The group argued that government’s failure to provide adequate and accessible water forced most residents to rely on private boreholes, with over 70 percent of households depending on them as their primary water source. It stressed that demanding payment for permits without providing basic amenities amounted to extortion.
CCNC also faulted the involvement of a private consultant, Royal Gem Multi-Sector Ltd, in the collection of revenue for the policy, questioning its transparency and accusing the government of bypassing the state’s internal revenue board.
The coalition warned that the policy would increase poverty and inequality, while exposing the administration to public criticism and political backlash. It emphasized that water is a basic necessity and not a luxury that should attract unnecessary levies.
Comparing Osun’s model to Oyo State, the group said revenue generated from such permits in other states had not translated into improved water supply or industry support. It urged the government not to copy what it called an “anti-masses policy.”
The coalition demanded the immediate repeal of the policy, provision of adequate public water supply, transparent revenue collection through existing state structures, and proper support for industry practitioners.
CCNC noted that the government must prioritize the welfare of citizens above revenue drive, insisting that placing the burden of water access on the public was unjust and counterproductive.