Connect with us

World

Don Jr. Has a Theory On What Really Happened to Brett Kavanaugh

Published

on

don jr bret kav 01

Brett Kavanaugh was a bad choice for SCOTUS.

***FOLLOW US ON RUMBLE***

And it’s not Trump’s fault.

Advertisement

We need to change the entire nomination process. Republican presidents are getting their nominee choices from the Bush-era establishment wasteland known as the Heritage Foundation.

This is the type of institution that people like Liz Cheney loves.

Do we really want that group deciding who sits on The Supreme Court? Times are changing, and we need a new process.

New Rule: if a potential nominee doesn’t think like Clarence Thomas, they need to go.

Advertisement

If not, we’ll end up with another Kavanaugh – a total disappointment and abysmal failure.

MORE NEWS: Yet Another Trump-Hating RINO Just Bit The Dust

He’s John Robert’s Jr.

And speaking of that, Kavanaugh and Roberts teamed up and really stuck it to the country, medical patriots, and conservatives.

Advertisement

Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts joined the low-info liberal nut jobs on the SCOTUS and voted to KEEP the medical mandate in place.

NPR  reported that the court voted 5 to 4 in the CMS case to uphold mandatory vaccinations for Medicare and Medicaid providers. The court’s three liberals were joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The court said that the vaccine mandate for health care workers was, unlike the OSHA regulation, justified as just the kind of detailed regulations that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has long imposed as a condition for health care providers getting federal funds.

In addition, the court said the regulation serves to protect patients from being exposed to greater risks when they are in hospitals, nursing homes, rehabilitation facilities, ambulatory surgical care centers and other such medical providers.

Advertisement

***FOLLOW US ON CLOUDHUB***

Well, Don Jr. thinks he’s figured out what’s really going on with Brett Kavanaugh and why we “lost him.”

10

His theory goes off the assumption that the left always knew they couldn’t really stop Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court, but they could “break” him, so when he finally got on the bench, he’d never be another “Clarence Thomas.”

Kinda like the back-alley thug who breaks your pinky finger, then tells you if you get out of line again, things will get a lot worse.

Here’s what Don Jr. said: “The left broke Kavanaugh. That was always their intention and it worked. They turned him into a Roberts.”

Advertisement

Don Jr. is right.

The left devastated Kavanaugh, and personally, I think he’s terrified of them now, and it’s affecting his job.

Because no conservative in their right mind would vote to keep that mandate in place.

Advertisement

****FOLLOW US ON TELEGRAM***

We know for a fact that Roberts is likely compromised and being blackmailed for god-knows-what… and the same is true for Kavanaugh – he’s also compromised because he allowed the left to get into his head.

Remember how he broke down sobbing at his hearing? I am not condemning a man for crying, especially when he’s accused of so many disgusting things… but you can look back at that moment and see how it broke him.

The Internet Reacts To Brett Kavanaugh Crying His Way Through His Testimony

And I don’t think he ever recovered.

Advertisement

We lost Brett Kavanaugh that day.


adfree

DEAR MEMBERS,
Are you sick of seeing ads? Well then it’s time to get rid of them! WayneDupree.com is proud to offer a PREMIUM VIP MEMBERSHIP that eliminates ads and gives you the BEST browsing experience.

SIGN UP HERE and join us!

Advertisement

Follow Wayne on Rumble!

World

Biden State Department admits Trump’s Iran envoy is facing ‘serious and credible threats’

Published

on

Brian Hook

Yet they continue to negotiate in good faith in Vienna with the Islamic Republic. Why?

“Biden Admin: Former Trump Iran Envoy Facing ‘Serious and Credible’ Threats,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, January 26, 2022:

Advertisement

The Trump administration’s Iran envoy is facing “serious and credible” threats to his safety, according to a non-public assessment produced this month by the State Department and viewed by the Washington Free Beacon. The determination was delivered to Congress amid a campaign of public death threats by Iran aimed at former president Donald Trump and top administration officials.

The State Department in an unclassified but non-public assessment provided to Congress on Jan. 11 determined that a “specific threat persists with respect to former special representative [for Iran] Brian Hook,” who helmed the Trump administration’s maximum pressure campaign on Tehran and was instrumental in the assassination of Iranian terror leader Qassem Soleimani. The document does not name the actors behind the threats, describing them only as a “foreign power or the agent of a foreign power.”

Iran, however, has repeatedly threatened to kill Trump administration officials, including Hook, as payback for the 2020 drone strike on Soleimani. The State Department determination indicates that Hook has been under a “serious and credible” threat since at least January 2021, when Trump and former secretary of state Mike Pompeo were still in office. The Biden State Department determined on three separate occasions, most recently November 2021, that the threats persist, according to the notification.

The State Department’s latest assessment comes amid public comments by top Iranian leaders that threaten the lives of Trump and senior members of his administration. Iranian government accounts on Twitter and other social media sites promised multiple times this month to assassinate Trump, with the regime issuing an official video that depicts a drone strike on the former president. The Biden administration says it takes these threats seriously and will do everything it can to protect former and current officials.

The State Department’s notice to Congress was issued just days after a former top Iranian official bragged about the death threats against Hook in the Iranian media. Hussein Mousavian, a former member of Iran’s nuclear negotiating team who works as a Middle East security and nuclear policy specialist at Princeton University, sparked a media firestorm when he was seen touting the threats against Hook in a documentary produced by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

Advertisement

“I went to America and an American told me that Brian Hook’s wife can’t sleep, she cries and trembles, she told Brian, ‘They’ll kill you,’ since Hook was a partner in the death of Haj Qassem [Soleimani], that’s how much they were trembling,” Mousavian said in the documentary 72 Hours, produced and released this month by a company tied to the corps.

Iran has tried multiple times during the past several years to assassinate and kidnap enemies outside its borders, including in the United States. Four members of an Iranian intelligence network were indicted last year in a New York federal court for attempting to kidnap a prominent regime opponent, highlighting Tehran’s reach into the United States. Iran also tried to assassinate the U.S. ambassador in South Africa, as well as Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in Washington, D.C.

Mousavian’s comments—as well as his close ties to the Iranian ruling regime—put Princeton in the hot seat, with U.S. advocacy groups calling on the high-profile university to fire him. Mousavian, who regularly travels between Iran and the United States, has worked at Princeton since 2009 and has served in senior roles for the Iranian regime. His perch at Princeton demonstrates how Tehran has been able to mainstream its allies into prominent positions at U.S. universities and other American outposts, such as D.C.-based think tanks….

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Netherlands: Muslim adviser to ruling party spent time in prison as part of jihad group that wanted to kill Wilders

Published

on

Soumaya Sahla

Soumaya Sahla has just resigned as an adviser to the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the party of Prime Minister Mark Rutte. This is because it was recently revealed that in 2005, Sahla was arrested and charged with terrorist activities as a member of the Hofstad Network, an Islamic jihad group in the Netherlands that wanted to murder Wilders for criticizing of Islam. She had an automatic weapon when she was arrested, and spent three years in prison. The VVD apparently didn’t know or care about her past, until Wilders called attention to it. After all, they hate Wilders, too.

“Frits Bosch column: Soumaya had the entire VVD by the tail,” translated by Gary Fouse from “Column Frits Bosch: Soumaya had hele VVD bij de staart,” by Frits Bosch, De Dagelijske Standaard, January 27, 2022

Advertisement

Since 2011, Soumaya Sahla has been the right hand of the VVD celebrity Frits Bolkestein, 88. She was never a problem for the party until Geert Wilders rang the bell, and her past was revealed during the Second Chamber (Parliament) talks over the coalition accord. The mainstream media and the (2nd) Chamber were furious that Wilders came forward, he was “racist”. Until big objections arose against her from the VVD itself, “How can this be, why didn’t we know?”. A spicy detail is that Geert Wilders himself enjoyed the mentorship of van Bolkestein as a faction member of the VVD. It is completely right that Wilders came forward. Fortunately, there is still someone awake in the 2nd Chamber.

It would be appropriate if the mainstream media swiftly offered their apologies to Wilders. Naturally, they won’t do that. The moral level of the mainstream media and Chamber members is lousy, but that’s not news. Ignore the potential danger of a dangerous threat.

Soumaya is working on a dissertation on “the orthodox, religious worldview”. Sahla is Muslim, fine. But she was and perhaps still is orthodox, Islamist, Salafist. I hope that she will also read the books by Christopher Hitchens, “God is not great” and by Afshin Ellian, “Allah does not know better”. They (would) save her a lot of work.

Islam has the controversial practice of taqiyya. It would allow Muslims, “for the good cause” to feign integration and moderation, to emerge like a devil out of a box as a true Muslim if that makes sense. So in England, in part of London, sharia law applies. Here no. Do (Kauthar) Bouchallikht and Sahla practice taqiyya? We’ll never know.

The next question is how is Kauthar Bouchallikht doing, also with her “fine past”. She is keeping a low profile and so is the Green-Left (party). Incomprehensible that these women with a terrible history, got through the beauty commission of our political parties. It works every time. Where is the thinking? This cannot be?!

Advertisement

They are, indeed, “clean women”. Somaya Sahla is herself stunning in a pretty suit in order to come across as especially adapted. Would she “tickle” Bolkestein in his (sensitive) place? What do you think?

Bolkestein has been a first-class mop throughout his unimpressive political career. A frightfully vain fellow, as I once noticed during a seminar on Islam. He is a man who says A but shrinks from B. He thought that we and (Pim) Fortuyn would cut a sorry figure internationally. Now he has made a fool of himself. Justifiably, this dull party is in a heavy downward trend.

——————————————————————————————————-

Below, from Blikopnieuws (see link) is a translation of Sahla’s statement:

Advertisement

“There has been a lot of commotion in the past weeks about me and my past. I regret that deeply and feel the need to say a few things about it. I want to be held accountable for a period of 16 years ago which I am not proud of. It is a black page in my life. I deeply regret the choices that I made then, and everyone in my circle knows that about me. I turned those pages a long time ago. I now see that it is good that (I) also express this regret publicly.

I gladly dedicate myself daily to the safety and freedom of our beautiful country. From this motivation, I am also actively involved in the VVD. The commotion that has arisen stands in the way of my positive contribution at this time. Thus, I am resigning my chairmanship in the J and V thematic network. I remain motivated to look where I can make a contribution in a free and safe society. I am also remaining in the VVD.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading