Troops of the Nigerian Army(NA) in a joint operations conducted with other security agencies have dislodged a notorious stronghold of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra ( IPOB) and its armed affiliate, Eastern Security Network (ESN) at Lilu Forest in Ihiala Local Government Area of Anambra State.
Lilu is a border town between Imo and Anambra States, which was hitherto known to be used as an operational base of the dissidents.
A statement released by Brig. General Onyeama Nwachuku, the director of Army Public Relations, states that the operations, which were conducted in the early hours of Monday 17 January 2022, led to the neutralization of some gunmen in a firefight that ensued.
”After dislodging the dissidents from their fortress, the dogged troops recovered 10 Pump Action Shotguns, two locally fabricated guns, One Revolver pistol, rounds of 7.62 mm special, live cartridges, machettes and IPOB flags. Other items recovered are mobile phones, laptops amongst other dangerous weapons.”the statement read in part
He added that the operation was jointly conducted by troops of 82 Division, Nigerian Navy, 211 Quick Response Group of the Nigerian Air Force, Department of State Services and the Nigeria Police. He mentioned that it was a well-coordinated dawn attack on the fortress, where plans were been perfected to violently enforce the illegitimate sit-at-home declaration by the irredentist groups.
READ ALSO Help Northern Governors First To Secure Their States – IPOB Warns Miyetti Allah Over Proposed Vigilantes In Imo
New money laundering law: Inbound, outbound travellers to forfeit undeclared funds
With the newly signed Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) into law by President Muhammadu Buhari, an individual citizen or foreigner can no longer make or accept cash payment of a sum exceeding N5 million or its equivalent while a corporate entity can no longer make or pay the sum of N10 million or its equivalent.
As stipulated in the legislation exclusively obtained by Nigerian Tribune, specific provisions for financial institutions or designated non-financial business and profession to provide for appropriate risk management systems and procedures to mitigate risk posed by domestic and foreign politically exposed person as well as any person who has been entrusted with a prominent function by an international organization, as well as casino business including internet casinos and ship-based casinos.
The piece of legislation further forbids an individual to conduct two or more transactions separately with one or more financial institutions or designated non-financial businesses and professions with intent to: avoid the duty to report a transaction which should be reported under this Act; breach the duty to disclose information under the act by any other means.
As encapsulated in Section 1(a-e), the objectives of the Act include: provision for an “effective and comprehensive legal and institutional framework for the prevention, prohibition, detection, prosecution and punishment of money laundering and other related offences in Nigeria; strengthen the existing system for combating money laundering and related offences; make adequate provisions to prohibit money laundering; expand the scope of money laundering offences and provide appropriate penalties.
Section 1(e) of the Act also seeks to establish the Special Control Unit against Money Laundering under the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for effective implementation of the Money laundering provisions of the Act in relation to the Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions.
Section 2(1) of the bill which stipulates the limit of cash payments to make or accept cash payment, provides that: No person or body corporate shall, except in a transaction through a financial institution, make or accept cash payment of a sum exceeding- N5,000,000 or its equivalent, in the case of an individual; or N10,000,000 or its equivalent, in the case of a body corporate.
Section 2(a and b) further provides that: “A person shall not conduct two or more transactions separately with one or more Financial Institutions or Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions with intent to: avoid the duty to report a transaction which should be reported under this Act; breach the duty to disclose information under the act by any other means.
Section 3(1) of the bill signed into law by President Buhari makes it mandatory for declaration of international transfer or transportation of funds, securities and cash, provides that: “A transfer to or from a foreign country of funds or securities by a person or body corporate including a Money Service Business of a sum exceeding US$10,000 or its equivalent shall be reported to the Unit, Central Bank of Nigeria and Securities and Exchange Commission in writing within 7 days from the date of the transaction.
IN CASE YOU MISSED THESE FROM NAIJAONPOINT.COM.NG
Section 3(2-5) further stipulates that: “A report made under subsection (1) of this section shall indicate the nature and amount of the transfer, the names and addresses of the sender and the receiver of the funds or securities.
“Transportation of cash or negotiable instruments in excess of US$10,000 or its equivalent by individuals in or out of Nigeria shall be declared to the Nigerian Customs Service. The Nigerian Customs Service shall report any declaration made pursuant to subsection (3) of this section to the Central Bank and the Unit.
“Any person who falsely declares or fails to make a declaration to the Nigerian Customs Service pursuant to section 12 of the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, Cap. F34, LFN, 2004 commits an offence and is liable on conviction to forfeit the undeclared funds or negotiable instrument or to imprisonment to a term of not less than 2 years or to both.”
Section 4(1a-d) of the Act makes it mandatory for the Financial Institution and a Designated Non-Financial Business and Profession, to: identify a customer, whether permanent or occasional, natural or legal person or any other form of legal arrangements, using identification documents as may be prescribed in any relevant regulation; verify the identity of that customer using reliable, independent source documents, data or information; identify the beneficial owner using relevant information or data obtained from a reliable source such that the Financial Institution or the Designated Non Financial Business and Profession is satisfied that it knows who the beneficial owner is; and take reasonable measures to verify that any person purporting to act on behalf of the customer is so authorised, identified and verify the identity of that person.
Section 4(2a-d) also mandates the Financial Institutions and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions shall undertake customer due diligence measures when – establishing business relationships; carrying out occasional transactions above the applicable designated threshold prescribed by relevant regulations, including transactions carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked; carrying out occasional transactions that are wire transfers; there is a suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing, regardless of any exemptions or thresholds; or the Financial Institution or Designated Non-Financial Business and Profession has doubts about the veracity or adequacy of previously obtained customer identification data.
On the politically exposed persons, Section 4(7) provides that: “Financial institutions or Designated Non-Financial Business and Profession shall put in place appropriate risk management systems and procedures to determine whether a customer or the beneficial owner of a customer is a politically exposed person.”
Section 4(8a-d) provides that: “In relation to a foreign politically exposed person, the financial institution or identify a customer, whether permanent or occasional, natural or legal person or any other form of legal arrangements, using identification documents as may be prescribed in any relevant regulation; verify the identity of that customer using reliable, independent source documents, data or information; identify the beneficial owner using relevant information or data obtained from a reliable source such that the Financial Institution or the Designated Non Financial Business and Profession is satisfied that it knows who the beneficial owner is; and take reasonable measures to verify that any person purporting to act on behalf of the customer is so authorised, identified and verify the identity of that person.
Section 12(1-2) of the Act also prohibits the number or anonymous accounts, accounts in fictitious names and shell banks.
According to the legislation, “The opening or maintaining of numbered or anonymous accounts by any person, Financial Institution or body corporate is prohibited. A person shall not establish or operate a shell bank in Nigeria.”
Section 12(4a-b)(ii) however provides that: “Any person, Financial Institution or body corporate that contravenes the provisions of subsections (1), (2) and (3) of this section, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to- in the case of an individual, a term of imprisonment of not less than 2 years but not more than 5 years; or in the case of a financial institution or body corporate, a fine of not less than N10 million but not more than N50 million, in addition to – the prosecution of the principal officers of the body corporate, and the winding up and prohibition of its constitution or incorporation under any form or guise.”
As encapsulated in the Act, unlawful shall constitute: participation in an organized criminal group; racketeering, terrorism, terrorist financing; trafficking in persons, smuggling of migrants, sexual exploitation, sexual exploitation of children; illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; illicit arms trafficking, illicit trafficking in stolen goods; corruption, bribery, fraud, currency counterfeiting; counterfeiting and piracy of products, environmental crimes; murder, grievous bodily injury; kidnapping, hostage taking, robbery or theft; smuggling (including in relation to customs and excise duties and taxes), tax crimes (related to direct taxes and indirect taxes); extortion, forgery, piracy; insider trading and market manipulation; and any other criminal act specified in this Act or any other law in Nigeria including any act, wherever committed in so far as such act would be an unlawful act if committed in Nigeria.
How open defecation fuels poliomyelitis, other infectious diseases in Nigeria —Experts
AS Nigeria battles to permanently eliminate poliomyelitis, findings have revealed that the persisting open defecation, which has been identified as the virus’ primary transmission source in the country, is a hindrance to the realisation of the objective.
UNICEF Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Specialist, Monday Johnson, has asserted that polio, which is spread by person-to-person contact with the virus living in the throat and in the intestines, is contracted through contact with the faeces (fecal-oral spread) or by droplet spread in a sneeze or cough.
He said, “Polio can also be spread by an infected person who has contaminated food or fluids by touching or tasting them. Unfortunately, a person can be infectious and transmit the virus even before they develop any symptoms as it lives in an infected person’s throat and intestines.”
He also said polio can be spread if a person picks up minute pieces of faeces with hands, and touches the mouth and also objects like toys that are contaminated with faeces touches the mouth.
A top UNICEF official, Zaid Jurji, said, “The situation of sanitation in Nigeria is alarming. Nigeria is third worldwide when it comes to open defecation; one-third of the population practise it,” Jurji wondered why Nigeria, which he described a “heavyweight country” that is held in high regard globally, should still be entangled in this infamy.
“However, the number of people still defecating in the open remains high and the problem needs addressing, which is why countries, such as Nigeria, are tackling the issue head-on.
“Open defecation can harm and negatively affects the health of countries’ populations through the contamination of drinking water and the spread of contagious diseases such as cholera, diarrhoea and dysentery,” Jurji said.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) recently linked 12.6 million yearly deaths to unhealthy environments.
Also, the health body said diarrhoea accounts for nine per cent of the death of children under five years worldwide, which is essentially as a result of faecal-oral disease, where germs are ingested due to contact with infected faeces.
Official data shows that Nigeria loses over 150,000 children to diarrhoea yearly.
The United Nations Children Education Fund (UNICEF) revealed that the diarrhoea prevalence rate in Nigeria is 18.8 per cent and is one of the worst in sub-Sahara Africa, above the average of 16 per cent.
The body also said that diarrhoea accounts for over 16 per cent of child deaths in Nigeria and an estimated 150,000 deaths, mainly among children under five occur yearly, which is mainly caused by poor sanitation and hygiene practices.
Despite the high statistics regarding open defecation in Nigeria, the country is attempting to tackle the problem.
Nigeria has made progress toward improving sanitation through its ‘Clean Nigeria: Use the Toilet’ campaign.
This national campaign aims to completely rid the country of open defecation by 2025 through the encouragement of hygiene behaviour in 47 million Nigerians.
Parts of Nigeria, such as the Cross River State in the South-Eastern region have made progress within the country after becoming the first open defecation-free local government area.