Connect with us

World

Turkey: One in three women has been a victim of domestic violence

Published

on

Kübra Eken

Why is this happening? The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34

Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” — Sahih Muslim 2127

Another hadith states: “Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s Messenger came, Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!’” — Sahih Bukhari 7.77.5825

Advertisement

“Turkey’s ‘socially-sanctioned’ femicide is exposed in documentary featuring harrowing story of TV anchor who was beaten by her husband in row over their newborn – and a wife shot in her arms and legs for wanting a divorce,” by Monica Greep, MailOnline, December 1, 2021 (thanks to Henry):

The harrowing reality of Turkey’s violence against women crisis is exposed in a documentary featuring the heartrending testimony of women who had their children taken from them when they were viciously attacked by their husbands.

British-made documentary Dying To Divorce, released in cinemas last week, shines a light on socially sanctioned femicide in a country where a startling one in three women has been the victim of domestic violence.

The situation has worsened under the autocratic rule of President Erdogan, who champions conservative values and has undermined women’s rights. In 2019, 474 women were killed in Turkey, many by partners and relatives.

Advertisement

This year Turkey withdrew from the Istanbul Convention, a legally binding European treaty designed to prevent violence against women, protect victims and prosecute perpetrators, sparking nationwide protests.

TV presenter Kübra Eken, who has worked at Bloomberg News in London, was left with limited mobility and speech and permanent brain damage when her husband beat her over the back of the head in a row over their two-day-old daughter.

Another victim, identified only as Arzu, was left without legs or the use of her arms after her husband shot her seven times in close range when she asked him for a divorce.

During the attack, she begged for him to leave her the use of their arms so she could continue to care for her six children.

Advertisement

Both women had their children taken from them in the wake of the attack. Arzu’s were taken into care, while Kübra’s child was placed with her violent husband’s family.

Selected to represent Britain at the Oscars in the Best International Feature Film category, Dying To Divorce centres on Ipek Bozkurt, a lawyer and activist striving to protect women from violence.

‘This country protects murderers who would like to punish their wives, daughters or girlfriends who want to have different things in life than they did before,’ she says.

‘The legal system should give the correct message to the potential murderer that they will spend their entire lives in prison if they kill someone, if they kill a woman. Women homicides are political.’

Advertisement

Kübra, was a 28-years-old television reporter working Bloomberg News in London for when she met her husband Neptun, who was then working as a producer.

The pair returned to Turkey to marry, but two days after the birth of their daughter, Neptun savagely attacked his wife, hitting her in the back of the head four times.

Kübra suffered a serious haemorrhage which initially left her unable to speak or walk and she had to undergo intensive speech therapy in order to testify against her husband in court.

Neptun claimed the damage to his wife’s brain was the result of the Caesarian section operation she had undergone days earlier.

Advertisement

Kübra’s husband withheld access of their daughter as the case was ongoing, with Kübra’s mother’s claiming: ‘The court granted Kübra the right to see her daughter three days a week. But his family have never let her see her.’

After strenuous speech therapy, Kübra was able to testify in court and her ex-husband was charged with assault.

He was sentenced to 15 months in prison but his sentence was reduced for good behaviour, meaning he has not spent a day behind bars….

Advertisement

World

NM Dems Are Moving Fast To Allow 16-Year-Olds To Vote, And That’s Not All!!

Published

on

yutgf

Before this year’s midterm elections, which are projected to be extremely difficult for Democrats, Democrats in New Mexico are hurrying to amend the state’s voting regulations.

Among other things, the proposal would lower the voting age to 16 for local elections, increase the use of mail-in ballots, create an option for straight party-line voting on ballots, and remove the prohibition on convicted felons voting, though felons would not be allowed to vote while they are in prison.

Subscribe today to WayneDupree.com and go AD-FREE!! Let us keep you up to date with breaking news, and opinions. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $5.00 a month

Advertisement

Democratic state legislators, led by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, are proposing a comprehensive overhaul of the state’s election rules in order to combat what they describe as a “wave of anti-democratic sentiment” throughout the country.

“Protecting voting rights is critical to protecting our democracy and ensuring that the views of New Mexicans are heard,” said Mrs. Lujan Grisham, a Democrat who is up for reelection this year and is also facing a difficult reelection campaign. New Mexico is taking every step possible to defend and extend voting rights at a time when voting rights are under threat around the nation.

In addition, under Mrs. Lujan Grisham’s plan, persons who do not have a state-issued ID would be able to register to vote online using their Social Security number. Her proposal would also make Election Day a state holiday, which she opposes.

Democratic lawmakers, according to Republicans, are engaging in nothing short of a “power grab.” They claim that Mrs. Lujan Grisham, whose popularity rating has plummeted as a result of anger over coronavirus limitations and sexual harassment allegations, is attempting to modify New Mexico’s election rules in order to benefit Democratic candidates.

Advertisement

Hey iPhone Users! Download The Award-Winning Wayne Dupree Podcast Today And Stay Updated With The Best Grassroots “Real Talk” Opinion!

According to state Rep. Rebecca Dow, a Republican member who is spearheading the opposition to the ideas, “the polls are absolutely indicating that this is a majority-minority state where Hispanics are prepared, eager, and ready to vote Republican.” “Democrats are well aware that a Republican wave is on the horizon, and they are doing all they can to thwart it.”

Mrs. Dow and her colleagues cite aspects in the Democratic plan, such as the one allowing for straight-party voting, as evidence of their case. Straight-party voting, which is also used in numerous other states, enables voters to tick a box on their ballot if they wish to support the whole slate of candidates for a single political party.

As Mrs. Dow pointed out, “there has never been a need for such legislation in the past.” “This is a solution in search of an answer,” the author writes.

Advertisement
Untitled design

The battle over New Mexico’s voting laws begins as President Biden’s elections legislation comes to a grinding stop in Congress. Initially, Democrats in Washington hoped to approve a comprehensive rewrite that would overturn new voting regulations enacted by Republican-controlled states. A lack of unity among Senate Democrats ultimately brought to the failure of that initiative.

Democrats in New Mexico argue that the failed federal attempt provides them with even more justification to put through their own ballot initiatives.

Hey Android Users! Download The Award-Winning Wayne Dupree Podcast Today And Stay Updated With The Best Grassroots “Real Talk” Opinion!

“Even as we’ve seen attempts around the country to make voting more difficult for eligible voters, here in New Mexico we continue to be a leader in how to balance the demands for voter access with the needs of maintaining our high levels of election security,” said Maggie Toulouse Oliver, New Mexico’s Democratic secretary of state. “With the passage of this measure, we will have the opportunity to enact one of the most comprehensive voting rights legislations in our state’s history.”

Advertisement

Democrats pushed for the expansion of voting rights before of the 2020 presidential election, claiming that the COVID-19 epidemic necessitated the move.

 

10

 

 


adfree

DEAR MEMBERS,
Are you sick of seeing ads? Well then it’s time to get rid of them! WayneDupree.com is proud to offer a PREMIUM VIP MEMBERSHIP that eliminates ads and gives you the BEST browsing experience.

Advertisement

SIGN UP HERE and join us!

Follow Wayne on Rumble!

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

[WATCH] Psaki Has One Job And She Doesn’t Even Want To Do That! Why The Attitude?

Published

on

asdfrw2

After a heated confrontation with New York Post writer Steven Nelson, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki abruptly ended the conversation by informing him, “I believe we’re done!”

Psaki briefed reporters on Monday with a strict timetable in mind, which left her with just approximately 25 minutes to receive questions from reporters. Nelson, on the other hand, took three separate shots at the same issue, which concerned a Vanity Fair piece on Covid testing, as well as a follow-up inquiry regarding President Joe Biden’s visit to his house in Wilmington.

Subscribe today to WayneDupree.com and go AD-FREE!! Let us keep you up to date with breaking news, and opinions. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $5.00 a month

Advertisement

As Nelson began, he expressed surprise that “coronavirus testing for homes before Christmas” had not been brought up more frequently in the group. Nelson then referenced a VF report from October about a “Zoom meeting with administration officials” in which a proposal to “mass distribute coronavirus tests to homes before Christmas to prevent a winter surge of COVID 19 cases” had been floated, a plan that had been rejected at the time.

Nelson sought to know “which administration officials attended the October 22nd meeting” and “was President Biden personally informed at the time on that suggestion before it was passed over?” Nelson also wanted to know “which administration officials attended the October 22nd meeting.”

“Actually, it’s possible that people haven’t inquired about it because we’ve already done a lot of the things that were addressed at that meeting a couple of months ago, such as significantly extending our testing program and capacity,” Psaki said.

“And the concern at the time, which is a very tiny portion of the dialogue, was that the market had not developed enough to allow us to launch the website we’re launching tomorrow,” Psaki said.

Advertisement

The Covid team members who attended, according to Psaki, “regarded it as a really fruitful discussion, which means a good meeting, a lot of which we’ve tried to implement.”

Nelson attempted again, this time with the question, “How can President Biden shut down the virus if he isn’t, you know, informed on these ideas?” Nelson was unsuccessful. That is, after all, my question. So, I’m curious as to who the advisors were, and whether or not Biden was informed on this proposal at the time.”

Then Psaki snarked, saying, “I believe I just answered your question, to which you may not have been paying attention.” “Perhaps you were waiting to read your next question, which is great,” he said, before adding, “But I just answered your question.”

Hey iPhone Users! Download The Award-Winning Wayne Dupree Podcast Today And Stay Updated With The Best Grassroots “Real Talk” Opinion!

Advertisement
Untitled design

“Please allow me to continue,” Psaki shouted over Nelson’s complaints. Please allow me to finish, Steven. “Steven, I’m almost finished.”

In his explanation, Psaki said, “What I just said to you is that we do not have the capability at the present.” “We had a really productive meeting with this group,” says the facilitator. We all agreed that we needed to increase the amount of testing we could do. We did this in order to increase our testing capacity, and the president had previously utilized the Defense Production Act to make a $3 billion investment in the program. However, the market did not have the ability at that time to perform what we are planning to do in the future.”

Nelson attempted another time, but Psaki said, “I believe that answers your question.”

Advertisement

“Once again, I’ve provided an answer to your query. If you have any question, please let me know and I will gladly address it. If you don’t comply, I’ll go on to the next person,” Psaki continued after Nelson persisted in his refusal.

Psaki did not, in fact, respond to the specific issue that Nelson had posed, but she looked to be arguing that the facts she had presented made the question irrelevant in any case.

When Psaki criticized the concept of sending tests to people’s homes in America in December, Biden responded by telling ABC’s David Muir that he “wished I had thought about ordering” 500 million tests “two months earlier.”

10

“I’m unhappy that I wasn’t able to receive the answers I was looking for there, but I’ll go on to another,” Nelson said.

“Excellent,” Psaki said as Nelson went on.

Advertisement

‘The second issue is that, as President Biden’s first year comes to a conclusion, the data reveals that he spent about a quarter of his days, at least in part, in Delaware, which raises an interesting point. As a result of this. Will the White House rethink its decision not to reveal visitor log information from President Barack Obama’s Delaware residences?” Nelson was the one who inquired.

Hey Android Users! Download The Award-Winning Wayne Dupree Podcast Today And Stay Updated With The Best Grassroots “Real Talk” Opinion!

“In any case, the president travels to Delaware since it is his home state. It also serves as the burial ground for his son and his previous wife. In addition, it is a location that he clearly holds dear to his heart. “A lot of presidents go back to their hometowns when they are president,” Psaki said, perhaps in reaction to some other opponents who have expressed concern over the president’s travel. “A lot of presidents go back to their hometowns when they are president,” she said.

For the first time, the White House has made visitor records available to the public, going one step farther than the previous administration and many other administrations before it. “We’ll keep doing what we’re doing,” Psaki said.

Advertisement

Nelson attempted to continue, but Psaki interrupted him by stating, “Go ahead in the rear.” I believe we have completed our task and are ready to move on! “Go ahead and park in the rear.”

 

 

 

Advertisement

adfree

DEAR MEMBERS,
Are you sick of seeing ads? Well then it’s time to get rid of them! WayneDupree.com is proud to offer a PREMIUM VIP MEMBERSHIP that eliminates ads and gives you the BEST browsing experience.

SIGN UP HERE and join us!

Follow Wayne on Rumble!

Advertisement

Continue Reading