Connect with us

Religion

What does the Bible mean when it calls Jesus the ‘Son of God’?

Published

on

jesus

(Photo: Unsplash/Gerhard Reus)

If asked what Christmas is about most Christians would, I hope, agree that what Christians celebrate at Christmas is the birth of Jesus, the Son of God. However, in my experience what most Christians don’t stop and think about is what exactly the Bible means when it calls Jesus the ‘Son of God.’

In this article I want to explore how the Bible describes Jesus as Son of God in two different ways, as the king descended from the line of David, and as the second person of the Trinity, the eternal Son of God the Father.

A good way to start thinking about these two uses of the term ‘Son’ is to look at Luke’s account of the announcement by the angel Gabriel to Mary that she is going to give birth to Jesus. In this story we find the following familiar words which we hear year by year in church services at Christmas time:

Advertisement

“And the angel said to her, ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favour with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus.

He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High;
and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David,
and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever;
and of his kingdom there will be no end.’

And Mary said to the angel, ‘How shall this be, since I have no husband?’ And the angel said to her,

‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you,
and the power of the Most High will overshadow you;
therefore the child to be born will be called holy,
the Son of God’ (Luke 1:30-35).”

Advertisement

Many Christians who hear these words read at Christmas services assume that when Gabriel refers to Jesus as ‘the Son of the Most High’ and ‘the Son of God,’ he is making a reference to Jesus’ divine nature. This way of understanding these words is perfectly understandable given the way in which down the centuries Christian theology has used the words ‘Son’ to refer to the second person of the Trinity as a way of distinguishing him from the first person of the Trinity, God the Father.

Thus, Article II of Church of England’s Thirty Nine Articles refers to:

“The Son, which is the Word of the Father, begotten from everlasting of the Father, the very and eternal God, and of one substance from the Father, took Man’s nature in the womb of the blessed Virgin, of her substance.”

Here the word ‘Son’ is a description of Jesus as the second person of the Trinity, the Son who is eternally begotten from the Father.

Advertisement

However, this is not what the term ‘Son’ means in Luke 1:30-35. Rather, in Luke the term refers back to the use of the word ‘son’ in the promise made by God to King David back in 2 Samuel 7:12-14 of a human descendent of David to whom God will grant an eternal kingdom:

“I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come forth from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever.I will be his father, and he shall be my son.”

If we ask when Jesus becomes God’s son in fulfilment of this promise, the answer that Luke subsequently gives us is that Jesus is set upon the throne of his father David when he is seated at the right hand of God following his resurrection and ascension. This is what Peter means when he says in his sermon on the Day of Pentecost ‘that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified’ (Acts 2:38).

In the same way Paul says in Romans 1:4 that Jesus was ‘designated Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead.’

Advertisement

In these two passages ‘Lord,’ ‘Christ,’ and ‘Son of God’ mean the same thing, the king descended from David who rules the world on God’s behalf, and Jesus becomes this king as a result of his resurrection.

When I point this out, people generally say to me ‘Does this mean that Jesus was not Son of God from all eternity?’ The answer to this question is ‘Not at all!’ This is because what the New Testament tells us is that the very same person who becomes son as the king descended from David has also always been God’s Son as the second person of the Trinity.

The New Testament witnesses to this truth in two ways.

First, those writers who describe Jesus as the king who ascended to the throne of David after his resurrection are also clear that Jesus is none other than God himself.

Advertisement

We can see this in Luke’s account of the nativity, for instance, when Elizabeth refers to Mary as ‘the mother of my Lord’ (Luke 1:44), ‘Lord’ here referring to YHWH, the Lord God of Israel. Mary, says Elizabeth, is the mother of none other than God himself. We also see it in Romans 9:5 where Paul declares that Jesus is the Christ (i.e. the promised descendant of David) but he is also ‘God over all blessed for ever.’

Secondly, the New Testament uses the term ‘Son’ to refer to Jesus’ divine nature as well as to his status as the promised Davidic king.

Thus, in Hebrews 1:1-3 we read:

“In many and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets; but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. He reflects the glory of God and bears the very stamp of his nature, upholding the universe by his word of power.”

Advertisement

Here Jesus as Son shares his Father’s divine nature (which is what ‘bears the very stamp of his nature’ means) and for this reason he reflects God’s glory and shares God’s unique role of creating and ruling all things.

In similar fashion, in the prologue to John’s gospel ‘the only Son from the Father’ whose glory we have beheld (1:14) is none other than the Word who from all eternity ‘was with God’ and ‘was God’ (John 1:1). He is ‘God the only begotten’ (John 1:18).

In the words of the New Testament scholar Thomas Schreiner, what we learn from the New Testament is therefore that, ‘The one who existed eternally as the Son was appointed the Son of God in power as the Son of David.’

To put it another way, he who is already Son eternally through his divine nature also becomes Son in the Davidic sense through the successful completion of his incarnate mission.

Advertisement

And all of this is good news. It is good news because only the eternal Son, the second person of the Trinity, possesses the divine power necessary to save us by destroying sin and death forever, and the way he does this is by being born from the Virgin Mary as a human being at the first Christmas and then suffering, dying, rising, ascending and ruling on our behalf.

As Robert Jamieson puts it in his book The Paradox of Sonship:

“Christ’s divine and human constitution and his faithful execution of his incarnate mission are integral to his ability to save. Only one who is divine; who became human; who endured temptation and gave his life in death; who was raised incorruptible; and who now reigns in heaven can deal decisively with sin, give us access to God, and make the new creation our permanent possession.”

Martin Davie is a lay Anglican theologian and Associate Tutor in Doctrine at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford.

Advertisement

function pinterestCallback(result) { document.getElementsByClassName("pt_share_count").textContent=result.count; }

Religion

This Chinese Church Escaped Persecution, But Now Fears Being Returned to China

Published

on

01/26/2022 South Korea (International Christian Concern) – With thanks to an interview conducted by Radio Free Asia (RFA), we have learned that the members of the Shenzhen Holy Reformed Church are due to have their appeal for asylum heard by South Korean courts, following an initial rejection by the lower courts last year.

As many may recall, the Shenzhen Holy Reformed Church, often referred to as the ‘Mayflower Church’ for its resemblance to those seeking religious freedom on the Mayflower voyage to the US, has been taking refuge on South Korea’s Jeju island since 2019. The unregistered church had begun to face harassment from Chinese government officials and police, as running a church outside of the Chinese regulations is against Chinese law and religious guidelines. In an attempt for a better life for themselves and their children, a contingent of the congregation voted to leave China. However, after two years, their South Korean host has soured on their presence.

The congregation’s initial applications for asylum were rejected, and their appeal is expected to be heard by South Korea’s higher courts soon. If the congregation is denied by the Korean courts, they will be on a short timeline to leave Korea or they will be living there illegally and fearing a possible removal back to China.

Advertisement

The expected outcome of this congregation’s case remains uncertain, as Chinese nationals are rarely approved for asylum status in South Korea. Some allege this to a result of the South Korean government’s weariness of their communist neighbor – to accept refugee from China would be seen as a direct slight against the regional superpower. The congregation must also demonstrate a significant threat, and when dealing with a nation like China, the threatening party has a tight control on the information. Given that the global community is preparing to tune in for the Beijing Olympics next month, it can be assumed that the world has not fully come to terms with the scale of persecution in China.

Christians are among many of the religious groups in China facing regular and often harsh religious persecution. Under the leadership of Chinese President Xi Jinping, China continues to demonstrate an open hostility toward religious minorities, meaning that victims of persecution will continue to climb. Should this congregation be returned, it is expected that the CCP will have a close eye on them, if they are not punished for their alleged crime. While the status of the Mayflower Church in Korea remains undecided, we should not assume these Christians are out of options, as other Christian groups have heard their call for help. RFA has reported that this group has also applied for asylum in the US, however, there has been no comment on the situation further.

For questions, please contact: [email protected].

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Religion

Religious freedom violations persist in Iran

Published

on

(Photo: Getty/iStock)

Christians continue to suffer as a result of widespread religious freedom abuses in Iran, human rights organisations have warned. 

A new joint report by Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Article 18, Middle East Concern and Open Doors International found that violations persisted in Iran in 2021, with at least 59 Christians arrested over the course of the year.

Thirty Christians endured some form of imprisonment last year while 34 were detained by the authorities. 

Advertisement

At least 209 individuals were affected by judicial rulings, 35 of whom reported “intense psychological torture”.

The actual numbers are likely to be higher as many cases go unreported “either because no-one raises awareness — arresting authorities frequently issue threats to prevent publicity — or because those involved request confidentiality”, the organisations warned. 

The report notes some positive developments. In November, the Supreme Court said that the prison sentences of nine converts should be reviewed because “promoting Christianity and ‘Zionist evangelism’ in private homes is not an example of gathering and collusion against internal or external security as decided in the original verdict”.

“According to this decree, house-church activities and the promotion even of the pejoratively termed ‘Zionist’ Christianity are not crimes,” the report said.

Advertisement

“It remains to be seen how this ruling will be applied by the Revolutionary courts, but the Christians have at least since been released while their cases are reviewed.”

In another positive development, officials in the western city of Dezful decided not to press charges against eight Christian converts on the grounds that although apostasy is a crime under Sharia, it is not an offence according to the laws of Iran.

Despite these positive developments, the report warned of “inconsistencies” in the Iranian judicial system after the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of a Christian couple sentenced to 10 years in prison over their involvement in a house church.

“The differing decisions highlight the inconsistencies that plague the judicial system in Iran and suggest that favourable rulings reflect the views of individual judges rather than systemic improvements at the heart of the judiciary,” the report said. 

Advertisement

Recommendations in the report include a call to the Iranian government to uphold freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) for all citizens, and the release of Christians detained on “spurious charges” relating to their faith or religious activities. 

The report also calls for an end to the criminalisation of house church organisation and membership, and asks the international community to hold Iran accountable on FoRB by raising the issue during political and trade discussions involving the country. 

CSW’s Founder President Mervyn Thomas said: “Once again, this report provides an important reminder of the continuing violations faced by Christians in Iran.

“We urge the Iranian government to take heed of its recommendations and to end what amounts to the criminalisation of the practice of a religion the Iranian constitution claims to recognise.

Advertisement

“We also call for the government to ensure that all citizens, including members of the Baha’i, Gonabadi Dervishe, Humanist and Sunni communities, are free to enjoy the full right to freedom of religion or belief as articulated in Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Iran is a signatory.”

function facebookCallback(result) { document.getElementsByClassName("fb_share_count").textContent=result.shares; }

function pinterestCallback(result) { document.getElementsByClassName("pt_share_count").textContent=result.count; }

Continue Reading