In Richard Linklater’s ‘Apollo 10½: A Space Age Childhood’ or ‘Apollo 10½,’ the story takes place in the Houston area during the 1969 Apollo 11 Moon landing. The protagonist is an elementary school boy named Stan or Stanley (Milo Coy). The narrator of the story is his older version (Jack Black). Stan lives in the suburbs with his parents and five siblings. Stan’s father works as the head of the shipping and receiving at NASA. Living in what is supposed to be the global capital of scientific advancements for all intent and purpose, Stan has the license to dream without any limit. As the day of the launch approaches, he creates an imaginary world where he is a young astronaut. The title of ‘Apollo 10½: A Space Age Childhood’ tells us much about the film’s narrative. Here is everything you need to know about it. SPOILERS AHEAD.
What Does the Meaning of Apollo 10½ Title?
To understand the meaning of the title, we must first understand the narrative. The Apollo 10½ Mission isn’t real. The entire thing — from meeting the two NASA agents to training for the mission itself — has been imagined by Stan. Because of his father’s job, he has more knowledge about what goes on in NASA than most children of his age in the world, even if he thinks his father’s job isn’t glamorous. Stan envisions that he has been selected to be the astronaut on the Apollo 10½ Mission.
During the Apollo 10 Mission, which was conducted between May 18, 1969, and May 26, 1969, the astronauts descended in their lunar module down to about 8.4 nautical miles (15.6 km) of the lunar surface. The Apollo 11 Mission, taking place from July 16, 1969, to July 24, 1969, was the historic mission that finally took humanity to the Moon, and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the surface. Stan envisions himself going to the Moon as the astronaut for the mission between Apollo 10 and Apollo 11.
What Does Apollo 10½ Title Signify?
The title of ‘Apollo 10½: A Space Age Childhood’ signifies that the entire film revolves around the imagination of an elementary-school boy. Richard Linklater, the film’s writer-director-co-producer, came up with the idea while making ‘Boyhood.’ The character of Stan is loosely inspired by Linklater’s own childhood in the Houston suburbs. The experiences of his siblings, friends, several other people residing in Houston at the time also play a crucial role in the development of the character.
Stan is told by the NASA Officials that recruit him that they have built a lunar module that is small than what is standard and can only be operated by someone of Stan’s age and built. Its smaller size of it also plays a role in the name. Half (½) has often been used for things involving children. For instance, in the film, Stan’s frugal father claims that some of his children are less than 12 years old when he doesn’t want to pay half of what he is supposed to at the tick counter of a drive-in theater. Similarly, the “half” part in the title refers to the fact that Stan is less than 12 years old.
Read More: What Is the Meaning of Apollo 10½ Title? What Does it Signify?
Where is Keith Laborde Now?
Vincent Simmons was just 25 when he was sentenced to 100 years in prison after being accused of violently raping Karen and Sharon Sanders — a set of 14-year-old twins — a crime he maintains he never committed. However, as explored in ’48 Hours: Please Don’t Tell,’ Karen and Sharon Sanders insist he’s guilty despite recently agreeing to drop the charges against him and the supposed odd involvement of Keith Laborde. So now, if you wish to find out more about the latter, especially the details of his relationship with the sisters as well as his possible current whereabouts, here’s all that we know.
Who is Keith Laborde?
At the time of the alleged incident on the evening of May 9, 1977, an 18-year-old reported Marine Corps officer Keith Laborde was with Karen and Sharon Sanders, who are his first cousins. He was driving them back home from his place when he picked up a hitchhiker from 7-11, as per their accounts, only for it to end up with him forced into the trunk of his vehicle at knifepoint. Like the girls, once they went to the authorities with this ordeal two weeks later, Keith insisted their assailant was a Black man, whom they all individually later identified as Vincent Simmons from a lineup.
With that said, though, one of their other cousins has since claimed that the trio lied at every step of the way, which is something Keith personally told her at a bar long after Vincent’s conviction. “He told me that he had consensual sex with one of the girls and locked the other in the trunk,” Dana Brouillette stated in a sworn affidavit. She later explained, “He had gone down Little California Road, and he locked Sharon in the trunk, and he said the sex between him and Karen was consensual. He said, but the other one was a little hellcat… [She] put the scratches on his neck.”
Dana actually believes Keith, Karen, and Sharon concocted the story of a Black man attacking them to justify the noticeable scratches, along with the state of their overall appearance that night. But Karen clarified the entire situation in an interview with CBS by stating that although she did engage in consensual sex with Keith, it was way before the summer of 1977. She was reportedly just a child back then, whereas he was a teenager, and they “experimented. But that has nothing to do with what Vincent did. That’s two separate incidents. That’s two separate things,” she said.
Where is Keith Laborde Now?
Despite the (seemingly unsupported) accusations against him, Keith Laborde has outrightly denied ever having sex with Karen, according to ’48 Hours.’ He told the production that they only “played around like children,” nothing less and nothing more, but yes, every part of it was consensual. Coming to his current standing, in his 60s, it appears as if the Louisiana native prefers to keep well away from the limelight these days because he purportedly has a family of his own.
Keith wholeheartedly maintains that Vincent is guilty, which is why when CNN approached him for an interview in 2020, he reportedly let his anger out in the form of profanities, threats, and racial slurs directed toward him. Keith concluded with, “This sh*t happened. It’s real. It happened. And I’m not dealing with this no more I’m not looking over my shoulder anymore… I had enough of this sh*t.”
Read More: Where is Vincent Simmons Now?
Is Ben Is Back Based on a True Story?
‘Ben Is Back’ is a 2018 drama film written and directed by Peter Hedges. It follows Ben Burns (Lucas Hedges), an athlete recovering from drug addiction, as he faces several internal and external conflicts. His mother, Holly Burns (Julia Roberts), provides unconditional support to her son while overcoming her own tribulations. The heartfelt film deals with the complex theme of drug addiction simplistically and realistically. Therefore, viewers must be wondering whether the film is inspired by real events or true stories. If you are looking for answers about the inspiration behind ‘Ben Is Back,’ here is everything you need to know!
Is Ben Is Back Based on a True Story?
‘Ben Is Back’ is not based on a true story. The film tells a fictional story written by Peter Hedges. However, Hedges’ screenplay is loosely inspired by his personal experiences with addicts. In several interviews, Hedges has opened up about the conceptualization of the film. The writer/director revealed that the film’s story and the subject are very personal to him. Hedges grew up in an alcoholic household, and his mother was an active alcoholic when he was seven years old. As a result, Hedges strived to make a realistic and relatable film about the horrors of addiction.
In a 2018 interview, Hedges explained that in the early 2010s, he was suffering from writer’s block. Around the same time, a close friend of Hedges passed away due to a heroin overdose. Shortly, actor Philip Seymour Hoffman, whom Hedges deeply admired, died in 2014 because of a drug overdose. As a result, Hedges became obsessed with the subject of addiction and threw himself into research about opioid addiction. However, he still could not translate his vast research onto the page.
To deal with his block, Hedges signed for a playwriting workshop in February 2017. During the workshop, Hedges wrote the first ten pages of ‘Ben Is Back’ and eventually completed the script. He presented the script to producer Nina Jacobson who was personally aware of the effects of opioid addiction due to the death of her son’s best friend. As a result, she decided to produce the film resulting in the production of ‘Ben Is Back.’
In an interview with THR, Hedges said that he crafted the Burns family’s dynamics based on his personal experiences. “In my own life, what became interesting was just that I grew up in a family where I had to lie a lot. We all lied. We pretended that we were better off and happier than we were. So all of those dynamics and energy in play, I was able to access in writing this. I just know it. I know it so well,” Hedges said.
The ‘What’s Eating Gilbert Grape‘ scribe also stated that during his research, he came across several instances where recovering addicts would slip back into addiction after being sober for some time. “They slip, and it made you wonder why, why is that happening. Sometimes they got clean, and they were prescribed a pain pill, and that pain pill brought them back in,” he said.
Subsequently, Hedges learned more about the role of prescribed pain medication in triggering the opioid epidemic in America and made it a crucial plot thread of his story. Ben’s struggles with addiction are presented through a story of love between a mother and son. Thus, the narrative becomes emotionally compelling and allows the audience to empathize with the tribulations of its main characters.
Ultimately, ‘Ben Is Back’ is heavily influenced by the personal experiences of Hedges and his research about real people with substance abuse disorder. However, the story itself is a work of fiction and is not a direct adaptation of any real incidents. It is rooted in the dynamics of an average American family and how drug addiction affects their lives. It is an impactful and honest representation of drug addiction’s vast and harmful emotional, psychological, and physical effects.
Read More: Where Was Ben Is Back Filmed?