AI tools changing the way journalists work

Artificial Intelligence is transforming journalism with tools that enhance writing, fact-checking, and transcription, sparking debates over efficiency, ethics, and the future of newsrooms, JUSTICE OKAMGBA writes

Artificial intelligence writing tools are becoming increasingly essential for journalists, offering ways to streamline content creation, automate repetitive tasks, and enhance productivity.

From grammar checkers to automated transcription and fact-checking tools, AI is shaping the way reporters gather and produce news.

However, opinions on the role of AI in journalism remain divided, with some industry professionals viewing these tools as an asset, while others question their impact on journalistic integrity.

AI writing tools

AI-powered writing tools have gained traction across various industries, and journalism is no exception. These tools assist with tasks such as grammar correction, content optimisation, and data analysis.

Hustlers University, an online learning platform, highlighted the benefits of AI tools, stating that they “streamline processes, improve efficiency, and provide valuable insights” in fields such as healthcare, business, and journalism.

For journalists, some of the most widely used AI tools include Grammarly, Quillbot, and NewsAI, which help refine writing by detecting errors and optimising content.

Additionally, natural language processing tools like IBM Watson and Microsoft Azure analyse large volumes of text to identify trends and generate insights.

One of the most impactful AI applications in journalism is automated transcription. These tools convert audio and video recordings into text, making it easier for journalists to transcribe interviews, speeches, and other recorded content.

“With automated transcription, journalists can save time and effort by quickly transcribing interviews,” Hustlers University noted.

Another crucial AI-powered tool is fact-checking. With the rise of misinformation and disinformation, journalists rely on machine learning algorithms to verify information and assess source credibility.

These tools can quickly flag inconsistencies in statements and detect false claims, providing an additional layer of verification for news reporting.

AI not a replacement

While AI tools can enhance efficiency, industry experts emphasise that they do not replace the fundamental role of journalists in investigating, reporting, and fact-checking stories.

“To build AI that can produce human-like works of writing, tech companies have had to ingest a large trove of written works, such as news articles and digitised books,” said journalist Blessing Ehiobu.

However, she cautioned that “these tools are not intended to, and cannot, replace the essential role journalists have in reporting, creating, and fact-checking their articles.”

Instead, AI provides journalists with options for headlines, different writing styles, and real-time collaboration, making it a supportive tool rather than a substitute for human judgement.

Ehiobu further explained that AI allows journalists to “quickly access new information, automate repetitive tasks, uncover emerging trends, and analyse large volumes of data.”

AI-powered tools also help reporters locate reliable sources and verify facts more efficiently. However, while AI can generate content automatically, journalists still bear the responsibility of checking, analysing, and verifying the accuracy of AI-generated material, she explained.

Diverse views on AI’s role in journalism

The integration of AI into journalism has sparked debate, with some professionals embracing its benefits while others remain sceptical.

A writer on Quora argued that AI would not replace experienced journalists but would instead aid them by making reporting more efficient.

“It will provide them with more information in less time and with less effort. It may replace some lower-level journalists who traditionally handle grunt work, but it will not replace skilled and experienced journalists,” the writer stated.

Retired official at Royal Dutch Shell, Gerry Tandberg, expressed concerns over the ethical implications of AI-generated content.

He warned that relying on AI for journalism could lead to issues of plagiarism and authenticity.

“Depending on who wrote the AI program, it will likely determine what the output is. In either case, it’s not entirely your work, therefore not ethical and bordering on plagiarism,” Tandberg said.

Meanwhile, proofreader and editor Mary-Ellen Candage dismissed the value of AI in journalism entirely, arguing that true writing skills cannot be replicated by technology.

“If you fancy yourself a ‘writer,’ do your own writing,” she stated. “AI won’t ever make you more attractive as a writer in any valid market—everyone knows you’re a fake.”

In contrast, Sales Director David Paul acknowledged the usefulness of AI for content generation, recommending tools like Jasper AI and Rytr Me for their ability to adapt to an individual’s writing style.

“If you’re looking for a reliable AI-powered content generation tool, then Jasper AI or Rytr Me would be good choices,” Paul said.

Future of AI in journalism

As AI technology continues to evolve, its role in journalism will likely expand. Many news organisations are already leveraging AI for tasks such as generating financial reports, summarising news articles, and analysing social media trends.

While AI can improve efficiency, its adoption in journalism also raises questions about ethical considerations, source credibility, and the potential for AI-generated misinformation. Experts agree that while AI tools can support journalists, human oversight remains critical to maintaining journalistic integrity.

Ehiobu reinforced this point, stating that AI should be viewed as a complementary tool that enhances productivity rather than replaces human journalists.

“These tools enable journalists, editors, and reporters to be more productive and efficient while still ensuring accuracy and credibility,” she said.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of AI in journalism depends on how it is used. While some see it as a game-changer that revolutionises reporting, others caution against over-reliance on automation.

As the debate continues, one thing remains clear: AI is here to stay, but the role of human journalists remains irreplaceable.