Githunguri Member of Parliament has sparked a political storm by alleging that former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua procured teargas canisters and bullets from the same supplier that provided his personal bulletproof jacket and helmet. The claim, made at a recent public gathering, raises questions about accountability and the intended use of the equipment.
“If the bullets and teargas came from the same source as his personal protective gear, it raises serious questions about public accountability and safety,” the MP said, suggesting potential misuse of crowd-control items.
The allegation has drawn significant attention from political analysts, who warn it touches on sensitive issues of security sector oversight and the influence of high-ranking officials. Civil society groups have called for a prompt and transparent investigation to verify the supply chain, emphasizing the need for strict oversight whenever public figures are linked to weapons or security apparatus.
So far, Gachagua has not publicly responded, and his camp’s silence has fueled further speculation. Security experts have cautioned that directly linking a prominent political figure to bullets and teargas is highly sensitive and could exacerbate political tensions, particularly as the country approaches the next election cycle.
The controversy highlights the delicate balance between personal security for public officials and the imperative of transparency and accountability. Kenyans are closely watching to see if formal investigations will be launched and whether Gachagua will address the allegations publicly.