The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has denied claims that it has turned itself into a weapon used by the ruling class against opposition politicians.
The EFCC, in a statement on Monday, released via its 𝕏 account, clarified that it is only faithful to its mandate of fighting corruption and nothing else.
The anti-graft agency added that its activities are without bias to political affiliations and all persons are treated equally.
The denial comes after a statement jointly signed by some opposition politicians, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi and others in which the EFCC, Nigeria Police and other state institutions were accused of being increasingly being deployed for “selective justice” with the ultimate aim of weakening opposition voices and dismantling the nation’s multi-party democracy ahead of the 2027 general elections.
However, the EFCC, in its response, said its mandate is strictly to tackle corruption and not opposition politicians.
To back up its claim, the EFCC submitted that the commission has arrested and prosecuted suspects from both the ruling party and opposition parties, as well as non-political actors.
The Commission stated that it won’t succumb to any form of blackmail from the opposition politicians and cautioned them against poisoning the minds of Nigerians against the EFCC.
The full statement reads: “The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, is aware of the frenzy of accusations by some political actors across the country, questioning its operation.
“Claims of ” Weaponisation of the EFCC”, ” Erosion of EFCC’s Independence”, ” Persecution of opposition politicians”, ” Politicisation of EFCC’s operations” and other assumptions contained in a recent media statement by some politicians, are deliberate misrepresentation of the Commission’s task in bringing suspects of economic and financial crimes to book.
“First, the Commission’s weapon is its Establishment Act which provides the ground norm of its activities. The Act mandates the Commission to investigate and prosecute all economic and financial crimes. The only exception to criminal prosecution by the Commission are political officers granted constitutional immunity during their tenure. Suspects of corrupt practices from the ruling party, opposition party and non-partisan actors have no immunity and are being equally investigated and prosecuted by the EFCC.
“A checklist of arrests and prosecutions by the Commission in the last two years under the current leadership shows that strong members of the ruling party, such as former governors, ministers and others not publicly known, are sharing tables with a motley number of opposition politicians, as well as others.
“The truth about the EFCC is that it is only faithful to its mandate and nothing else. This mandate is about tackling corruption and not any imaginary adversary or political motive The Commission finds insinuation made by opposition politicians that “there is a discernible pattern of persecution of the opposition by the EFCC with the sole objective of weakening same for the benefit of the ruling APC” quite untenable.
“Where is persecution in asking a suspect of corrupt practice to account for his sleaze? Is stealing, embezzlement of public funds, contract fraud, money laundering and other corrupt practices excusable for some? Corruption has no gender, religion, tribe, political party or other extraneous alignment. Selective outrage cannot be a defence against criminal investigation for graft. The crucial question is, are opposition politicians being investigated or prosecuted by the Commission wrongly accused?
“What threatens democracy is not the EFCC doing its job, but the attempt to intimidate or blackmail it into abandoning investigation allegations against corrupt opposition politicians for fear of accusations of selectivity.
“What the so-called opposition politicians are seeking to achieve in this assault against the EFCC is far from altruistic, but a veiled attempt to confer immunity from prosecution for alleged corruption on politicians who suddenly find themselves in the opposition. This gambit is alien to the Nigerian constitution and the enabling law of the Commission both of which compel mandatory action against any evidence of graft irrespective of the position and political inclinations of the accused.
“The Commission won’t succumb to blackmail or be railroaded into inconclusive investigations just to be seen to be non- selective in its operations.
“An amendment to the enabling Act to assuage the whims of a disgruntled section of the political class calls for circumspection as it is not likely going to be in the national interest.
“We enjoin all well -meaning , reform- minded and patriotic Nigerians to join hands with the EFCC in this dignity -restoring mandate.
“God bless the Federal republic of Nigeria.”